When categorizing people, celebrities, family etc. I guess it's best if we do it by last name? (example: Gwyneth Paltrow, categorizing by Paltrow, not Gwyneth) Or is it just me? :)
369Pages
ALL POSTS
We can't categorize them by last name, I don't think. The article has to be titled Last Name, First Name in order for that to work. Sorry!
(edited by Adele Addict)
0
I don't think so. There's two possibilities: the first one including to make a template, the socond one, you need to write like this: [[Category:Celebrities|Paltrow, Gwyneth]]. :)
(edited by Tor Duck)
Hmm... Well, I'm not very good with creating templates, so unless you want to, I would eliminate that option. And if the second option works, we can try that. I don't know if it will or not but I don't know why it wouldn't. I like your thinking! That would probably work. Can you test that out for me?
(edited by Adele Addict)
0
For order to make it work, you have to add the category in source (instead of after you finished). For instance in the Gwyneth-article: [[Category:Celebrities|Paltrow, Gwyneth]]. This makes the article being categorized by her last name, instead of her first one. Check it out, I have categorized it by her last name. All you need to do is to add the category in source mode, and put her last name first (if that give any sense).
(edited by Tor Duck)
I think that makes sense. If that's a more convenient way of categorizing celebrities, then I think that's a great idea! :) Thanks!
(edited by Adele Addict)
0
Your welcome! I can help reorganicing when there's time. ;)
(edited by Tor Duck)
That would be great, thank you so much! :)
(edited by Adele Addict)